Terminology Database

AirIndex Terminology Reference

Source-traced, scoring-linked terminology for vertical flight infrastructure. Every term is traceable to a primary federal standard or regulatory document.

This is not a glossary. It is the language standard that AirIndex scores against. City planners, legislators, infrastructure developers, and insurance carriers can use these definitions to ensure their documents align with FAA standards and AirIndex methodology.

Infrastructure

Final Approach and Takeoff Area (FATO)

InfrastructureVRT

The defined area over which the final phase of approach to a hover or a landing is completed and from which the takeoff is initiated. For eVTOL, the FATO is 2.0 times the controlling dimension (approximately 100x100 ft). For helicopters, the multiplier is 1.5. The FATO must be obstacle-free.

Source

FAA AC 150/5390-2D; FAA EB 105A

Incorrect Alternatives
approach areaflight pathlanding approach
Context of Use

Use in site design, obstruction analysis, and compliance assessments. The FATO dimension determines the obstacle-free zone around the TLOF. Encroachment into the FATO by buildings, trees, or power lines is the primary reason existing heliports fail eVTOL compliance checks.

Scoring Implication

FATO encroachment is the most common compliance failure at existing heliport sites. Markets with vertiport sites that have clear, documented FATO compliance score higher on VRT.

Added in v1.3

Heliport

InfrastructureVRTREG

A designated area used for helicopter landing and takeoff, as defined by the FAA. The FAA defines heliport as the umbrella category that includes helistops and, as of EB 105A, vertiports. 'Helipad' is not a defined FAA term and should not appear in city code, permit applications, or insurance policies.

Incorrect Alternatives
helipadhelicopter padhelicopter landing areachopper pad
Context of Use

Use in all regulatory, zoning, and permit documents where vertical flight infrastructure is referenced. 14 CFR Part 157 requires notification to the FAA for any construction or alteration of a heliport. The term 'helipad' has no legal definition in FAA regulations.

Scoring Implication

Heliport is the FAA-defined term for a designated area used for helicopter landing and takeoff. 'Helipad' is not a defined FAA term. Cities using 'helipad' in their code create legal ambiguity that can affect permit validity and liability exposure. This distinction directly affects the ordinance audit score in the Municipality briefing.

Added in v1.0

Helistop

InfrastructureVRTREG

A heliport without fueling, maintenance, or hangar facilities — typically a rooftop or ground-level landing area with minimal supporting infrastructure. Defined in FAA regulations as a subset of heliport.

Incorrect Alternatives
helipadlanding spottouchdown point
Context of Use

Use when referencing a heliport that provides only landing and takeoff capability. Most hospital heliports are technically helistops. The distinction matters for NFPA 418 fire code applicability and building code requirements.

Scoring Implication

Helistop is a recognized FAA term. Cities that correctly distinguish heliport and helistop in their code demonstrate regulatory sophistication that contributes to a higher REG factor score.

Added in v1.0

Touchdown and Liftoff Area (TLOF)

InfrastructureVRT

The load-bearing surface within the FATO where the aircraft actually touches down. For eVTOL operations, the FAA requires a minimum TLOF of 1.0 times the controlling dimension of the aircraft (approximately 50x50 ft for current eVTOL designs). For traditional helicopters, the multiplier is 0.83. This size differential is why fewer than 20% of existing heliports can accommodate eVTOL operations.

Incorrect Alternatives
landing padlanding zonetouch-down areatouchdown pad
Context of Use

Use in vertiport design specifications, site feasibility studies, and compliance assessments. The TLOF dimension is the primary determinant of whether an existing heliport can support eVTOL operations. Hospital helipads built to 40x40 ft TLOF standards cannot accommodate eVTOL aircraft requiring 50x50 ft.

Scoring Implication

The TLOF is the load-bearing surface within the FATO where the aircraft actually touches down. eVTOL requires a minimum 50x50 ft TLOF vs. the 40x40 ft standard most hospital helipads were built to. This distinction is critical in site compliance scoring — sites below the eVTOL TLOF minimum are flagged as non-viable for conversion.

Added in v1.3

Vertiport

InfrastructureLEGZONVRT

A designated landing and takeoff area for eVTOL aircraft. The FAA classifies vertiports as a subclass of heliport under Engineering Brief 105A. A vertiport includes a touchdown and liftoff area (TLOF), a final approach and takeoff area (FATO), and a safety area — all with larger dimensional requirements than traditional heliports.

Incorrect Alternatives
helipadlanding padair taxi padeVTOL padskyport
Context of Use

Use in zoning ordinance permitted-use definitions, building permit applications, infrastructure planning documents, and insurance policy language. The FAA unified Advisory Circular (expected June 2026) will merge vertiport and heliport standards into a single 'vertical flight infrastructure' document.

Scoring Implication

Cities that use 'vertiport' in their zoning ordinance as a permitted or conditional use score higher on the ZON factor. Using 'helipad' instead creates legal ambiguity and suppresses the LEG score. Under EB 105A, vertiports are a subclass of heliport — existing heliport ordinances automatically cover vertiports without requiring new legislative language.

Added in v1.3

Regulatory

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

RegulatoryLEGPLTREG

The federal government's preferred term for the ecosystem of new aviation technologies, infrastructure, and operations enabling urban and regional air transportation. AAM encompasses eVTOL aircraft, vertiport infrastructure, airspace integration, and supporting regulatory frameworks. UAM (Urban Air Mobility) remains in common use but AAM is the term appearing in federal legislation, DOT policy, and FAA program names (eIPP).

Source

FAA AAM National Strategy (Dec 2025); USDOT AAM Comprehensive Plan (Dec 2025)

Incorrect Alternatives
urban air mobility (UAM)eVTOL industryair taxi sectorflying car industry
Context of Use

Use AAM when referencing the federal policy framework, DOT programs, or the industry at large. UAM is acceptable when specifically discussing urban (intracity) operations. State legislation using AAM aligns with the federal framework and scores higher on LEG.

Scoring Implication

AAM is the federal government's preferred term as of the Dec 2025 National Strategy. State legislation using AAM aligns with the federal framework and scores higher on LEG. States using 'drone' or 'UAS' terminology for eVTOL-related legislation score lower because the language doesn't align with federal standards.

Added in v1.0

FAA Airspace Determination

RegulatoryREGZON

A formal FAA evaluation of proposed heliport or vertiport locations resulting in one of three outcomes: Concur (favorable), Concur with Exception (favorable with conditions), or Objectionable (unfavorable). The FAA issues approximately 3,868 conditional determinations and 42 objectionable determinations on record. The FAA has no enforcement mechanism to verify that conditions are ever implemented.

Source

14 CFR Part 157; FAA Form 7480-1

Incorrect Alternatives
FAA approvalairspace clearanceFAA permit
Context of Use

Reference in heliport/vertiport permit processes. Cities that require a favorable FAA airspace determination as a condition of heliport/vertiport permit approval provide regulatory teeth that the FAA alone cannot. This is one of the five questions in the AirIndex ordinance audit.

Scoring Implication

Cities that write the FAA airspace determination requirement into their permit process score higher on the ordinance audit. This simple addition gives the advisory FAA standard enforceable weight at the municipal level. Without it, heliports can be approved without any FAA airspace review — creating liability exposure.

Added in v1.3

Standards

FAA AC 150/5390-2D

StandardsREGLEGVRT

FAA Advisory Circular 150/5390-2D: Heliport Design. The primary FAA design standard for heliport infrastructure. While advisory (not legally enforceable by the FAA for private-use facilities), many states have adopted it as an enforceable standard through state legislation. The FAA is merging this document with Engineering Brief 105A into a unified 'vertical flight infrastructure' Advisory Circular expected for public comment in June 2026.

Incorrect Alternatives
FAA heliport rulesheliport regulationsFAA heliport law
Context of Use

Reference in state legislation, municipal ordinances, and compliance assessments. The AC is advisory at the federal level but becomes enforceable when adopted by states. Florida, California, Illinois, and New Jersey are among the states that have adopted it as enforceable. Texas has limited enforcement.

Scoring Implication

States that have adopted FAA AC 150/5390-2D as enforceable score higher on both REG and LEG factors. This is one of the five questions in the AirIndex ordinance audit. The June 2026 unified AC will supersede this document — cities that update their ordinance language before publication will be positioned to align with the new standard from day one.

Added in v1.3

NFPA 418

StandardsREGVRT

NFPA 418: Standard for Heliports, published by the National Fire Protection Association. The national fire safety standard governing heliport and vertiport facilities. Covers fire suppression, fuel storage, emergency access, and operational safety requirements. Referenced in the International Building Code (IBC) for rooftop heliports and helistops.

Incorrect Alternatives
helicopter fire codehelipad safety standardaviation fire standard
Context of Use

Reference in municipal fire code, building code, and vertiport permitting requirements. Cities whose fire or building code explicitly references NFPA 418 score higher on the REG factor. Cities that reference it only indirectly through IBC receive a partial score. Cities with no reference score zero on this sub-factor.

Scoring Implication

NFPA 418 is the national fire safety standard for heliports. Cities whose fire or building code explicitly references NFPA 418 score higher on the REG factor. Cities that reference it only indirectly through IBC receive a partial score. Cities with no reference score zero on this compliance question.

Added in v1.3

Operational

Enhanced Instrument Performance Products (eIPP)

OperationalWTH

An FAA program establishing partnerships between FAA and weather technology providers to deploy enhanced weather sensing at airports and vertiports. eIPP data provides low-altitude weather intelligence critical for eVTOL operations — wind, turbulence, and visibility conditions at altitudes below 500 ft AGL that standard ASOS/AWOS stations do not capture.

Source

FAA Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) Program; USDOT AAM National Strategy

Incorrect Alternatives
weather station programFAA weather upgrade
Context of Use

Reference in weather infrastructure scoring, market readiness assessments, and partnership discussions with weather technology providers. TruWeather Solutions (Don Berchoff, CEO) participates in 5 of 8 FAA eIPP teams.

Scoring Implication

eIPP deployment in a market upgrades Weather Infrastructure from partial to full, adding 5 points to the composite score. No US market currently has full eIPP coverage — this is the gap that caps every market below 100.

Added in v1.3

This terminology database is maintained by Vertical Data Group as part of the AirIndex methodology. For corrections, additions, or questions, contact info@airindex.io.

Citation

Source: AirIndex Terminology Database, v1.3 (airindex.io/terminology)

MethodologyDashboardBack to Home