Which sites, and which markets, first.
Sealed cohort reports for a portfolio, ranked site lists for a developer, and the customer list a vendor should be calling, grouped by owner. Each is the same substrate written for a different decision.
ReportSIR · sealed and anchored · Tier 1 to 3
Site Intelligence Report
A sealed, citable benchmark of a facility cohort before you commit to an engineering or financial feasibility engagement. Methodology block, distribution, the full AIX-keyed facility table, worked examples, and an audit record behind every figure. It is the triage layer, not the feasibility report.
- Tier 1 cohort analysis, 30 to 100 facilities, PDF plus JSON, one to two weeks
- Tier 2 adds selected-facility visual inspection; Tier 3 adds full-portfolio visual and network analytics
- Sealed on delivery: report number, methodology hash, file hashes, public verification record
Request a scoping call →FeedInstitutional API · developer site ranking
Priority Targeting Matrix
Candidate facilities ranked by regulatory tier, risk, conversion feasibility, and market proximity, so a developer knows which to evaluate first and which to skip. Scoped by market or state; reproducible via API.
- 0 to 100 priority with the components exposed
- Statute-sourced regulatory spectrum underneath
Access the matrix →ReportVendor lead intelligence · refreshed
Customer Identifier
For a vendor whose product closes a specific facility gap: every facility in that gap, grouped by owner so one conversation opens many sites, with the delta each refresh (who entered, who left). Delivered as CSV plus a written brief, refreshed on a cadence, and paired with advisory where wanted.
- Profile per vendor product; owner buckets by health system, public, independent
- True-distance market proximity, not the substrate's statewide market tag
- No referral commissions; reciprocal terms
Talk about a vendor profile →AdvisoryNegotiated
Custom intelligence and advisory
Direct engagements: persona briefings, gap analyses against your models, joint research, and market-entry advisory. The deliverable takes the shape of the question.
- Program-office and underwriting-team briefings
- Methodology gap analyses against internal models
- Retainer structures for market-entry work
Start a conversation →