Three questions most facility assessments don't answer.
Standard assessments ask: is it allowed? They check FAA registration, airspace determination, fire-code adoption. But they rarely ask: can it physically work? Will it behave under real-world conditions?
Dimensional constraints, airflow exposure, and environmental risk at the site level are invisible in FAA records. Assembling even the compliance layer takes 4-6 hours of manual research across fragmented sources. Most underwriting files skip it entirely.
What AirIndex delivers.
The RiskIndex Assessment evaluates all three layers — regulatory compliance, physical feasibility, and operational exposure — in a single AIS-backed dossier. Compliance grid, dimensional pre-screen, operational exposure flags (OEL), state context, satellite imagery, and an explicit underwriting recommendation. Same-day screen; full dossiers within five business days.
Every data point traces to FAA NASR 5010, OE/AAA records, or state regulatory sources. Where records are absent, the gap is flagged — not assumed away.
- ELEVATED / CRITICAL / MODERATE / LOW tier with 0-100 risk score
- Underwriting Recommendation (AIS-Based) with 4 stances
- Suggested Conditions — copy-paste ready for policy endorsements
- Remediation path + tier impact per risk factor
- Peer benchmark — "cleaner than X% of in-state peers"
- Same-day screen; full dossiers within five business days of facility submission
What decision this supports.
- Underwriting documentation and file completion
- Conditional coverage endorsements
- Multi-facility risk comparison across insured sites
- Compliance gap identification before renewal
Send us three to five facilities. Same-day screen; AIS-backed dossiers within five business days.
Talk to us →