Is this site actually operable — or just approved?
Most underwriting workflows validate regulatory compliance — FAA registration, airspace determinations, fire-code adoption. But compliance does not answer whether a facility can actually support safe operations.
Physical constraints, dimensional limitations, and environmental exposure at the site level are rarely evaluated. When a loss event occurs, the question becomes: what did you know, and when did you know it?
What AirIndex delivers.
AirIndex evaluates each facility across three layers: regulatory compliance, physical feasibility, and potential operational exposure. The output is a single underwriting-ready document with an explicit coverage recommendation — not a compliance check, but an operability assessment.
Every assessment is AIS-backed: derived from the same continuously updated scoring methodology published at airindex.io/methodology. All data points are auditable against primary sources.
- 4-tier risk classification (LOW / MODERATE / ELEVATED / CRITICAL)
- AIS-backed underwriting recommendation with suggested conditions
- 5-question compliance grid with per-question status
- Risk factors with severity, remediation path, and tier impact
- Peer benchmark (percentile ranking among in-state facilities)
- Satellite visualization of the facility and surrounding airspace
What decision this supports.
- Coverage terms and conditions
- Renewal-contingent endorsements
- E&O defensibility of the underwriting file
- Multi-facility risk comparison across insured sites
Send us three to five facilities. Same-day screen (gap status, risk tier, obstruction filings on record); full dossiers within five business days.
Talk to us →