Get an email when the record for Mission Hospitals changes: its FAA registration, pad data, nearby FAA airspace determinations, or AirIndex findings. A weekly digest arrives only when something changed.
Owner self-reported — never independently field-inspected
Location confidence
No coordinate anomaly detected
Terrain cross-check (USGS 3DEP)
FAA 2200 ft MSL · USGS ground 2201 ft · Δ -1 ft
Structure cross-check (Overture / OSM)
Ground-level — no building footprint at the coordinate
Cross-source consensus
Corroborated — terrain and structure agree (2/2 sources)
Cross-checked against independent public data — USGS 3DEP terrain, Overture/OSM building footprints, the federal hospital registry, and measured dimensions. The State of the U.S. Heliport Record →
eVTOL readiness
INFEASIBLE WITHOUT REMEDIATIONConversion feasibility · four readings, one line each
Obstruction screen
Severe
High obstacle within 0.5 nm conflicts with the expanded footprint and the 8:1 approach surface.
Geometry
Meets the FATO footprint
Recorded pad side 100 ft against a 100 ft eVTOL FATO.
Structural FATO
Unverified
The full 100 × 100 ft FATO must be load-bearing. The FAA does not record structural capacity, so no record can confirm it.
Overall
Infeasible without remediation
A high obstacle conflicts with the expanded footprint. Remediation or a different site.
This pad already covers the eVTOL landing footprint as it stands.
recorded pad eVTOL FATO
Recorded pad (limiting side)
100 ft
eVTOL FATO required
100 ft
FAA EB-105 vertiport pattern — 2× a ~50 ft eVTOL controlling dimension, plus a 125 ft safety-area side.
Load-bearing FATO
100 × 100 ft must be structural
No heliport precedent — typically the binding gate for rooftop and hospital pads.
Measured against FAA pad geometry and federal FATO sizing (EB-105). The obstruction screen is the only reading the engine verdict rests on; geometry and structural capacity are stated separately and never folded into it. A dimensional pre-screen — site-level validation required, and independent of the underwriting risk score.
FAA compliance
Q1 · FAA registrationPASS
Active FAA NASR 5010 record.
Q2 · Airspace determinationON_FILE
OE/AAA ASN 2025-ASO-6489-OE: DET-DNE
Q3 · State enforcementLIMITED
State has limited enforcement of FAA standards.
Q4 · NFPA 418PARTIAL
IBC references NFPA 418 for rooftop facilities. Standalone fire code reference not confirmed.
FAA facility data
FAA LID
NC95
AIX ID
aix:hp:HQKV9CY0
Lat / Lng
35.57533, -82.54850
Elevation
2200 ft MSL
Pad dimensions
100 × 100 ft
Surface type
CONC
Surface condition
FAIR
Activation date
2004/10
Last owner update
2022/05/02
FAA OEAAA airspace determinations3
Airspace clearance
Airspace clearance lapses within 180 days — flag for re-filing.
1 structure determined near the pad · tallest 165 ft AGL
Filing activity
Most recent determination 2025-03-27 · 1 in the last 24 months
OEDET-DNEexpires in 150dASN 2025-ASO-6489-OE2025-08-21
POLE$MONO · 165 ft AGL — Lighted, folding pole used for AWOS sensor
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2019-ASO-7633-NRA2021-03-02
Form 7480 · 84 ft AGL — LAP ASN # 2019-ESA-141-LAP
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2019-ASO-5695-NRA2019-10-01
Heliport · 178 ft AGL — New VFR one-helicopter hospital heliport on new building
Blueprint
The record vs. what we measured
62/100
DATA INTEGRITY
eVTOL footprint
Footprint assessment available.
SIGNALFEDERAL RECORDMEASURED
Surface elevation2200 ftnot cross-checked
Structurenot on recordGround-level
Pad dimensions100 ft side (filed)100 ft side · measured
Coordinate integrityas filedterrain cross-checked
Independent inspectionowner self-reportednone on record
✓Federal record
→
✓Cross-checkedUSGS · Overture · dimensions
→
3Physically verifiedGround Truth capture
Obstructions, exact FATO geometry, surface condition, and downwash exposure require a physical Ground Truth capture — not shown above as measured. A field verification completes the record and writes the measured truth to this facility’s authority.
This page is the public data-integrity record. The full RiskIndex assessment — Q1–Q5 compliance, dimensional / FATO analysis, an underwriting-grade risk score, peer benchmark, and a sealed Site Intelligence Report — is available on request.