Get an email when the record for Hangar 5 changes: its FAA registration, pad data, nearby FAA airspace determinations, or AirIndex findings. A weekly digest arrives only when something changed.
No hospital is linked to this landing site in our records. If it serves a hospital, tell us.
Is the FAA record right?
FAA status: Open. Last FAA inspection: none on record (common for private-use pads, which the FAA does not routinely inspect). Last update from the owner: 2025/05/21. Our check of the record: Corroborated (details below).
What has the FAA said about its airspace?
9 FAA airspace determinations are linked to this site; the airspace finding on file is on_file. The list is below.
What is being built nearby?
8 FAA obstruction filings within 1 nm in the last 12 months, the tallest 197 ft above ground. Builders file these before putting up cranes and structures that could affect flight paths.
To correct it, the facility manager signs in to ADIP and uses Airport Master Record, Update Facility Data (Airport/Heliport). The paper private-use form 5010-2 was retired in July 2024.
Building, changing, reopening or closing a landing site needs notice to the FAA on Form 7480-1 (14 CFR Part 157).
AirIndex compiles public FAA, federal and hospital records and checks them against each other. It is not a source for navigation or flight planning; use official FAA sources and your operator's procedures. See something wrong? Report a correction (how corrections work).
Data integrity
79/100
CorroboratedData Integrity Index
Independent inspection
Owner self-reported — never independently field-inspected
Location confidence
No coordinate anomaly detected
Terrain cross-check (USGS 3DEP)
FAA 1500 ft MSL · USGS ground 1507 ft · Δ -7 ft
Structure cross-check (Overture / OSM)
Ground-level — no building footprint at the coordinate
Cross-source consensus
Corroborated — terrain and structure agree (2/2 sources)
Cross-checked against independent public data — USGS 3DEP terrain, Overture/OSM building footprints, the federal hospital registry, and measured dimensions. The State of the U.S. Heliport Record →
eVTOL readiness
INFEASIBLE WITHOUT REMEDIATIONConversion feasibility · four readings, one line each
Obstruction screen
Severe
High obstacle within 0.5 nm conflicts with the expanded footprint and the 8:1 approach surface.
Geometry
Requires 60 feet of expansion
Recorded pad side 40 ft against a 100 ft eVTOL FATO.
Structural FATO
Unverified
The full 100 × 100 ft FATO must be load-bearing. The FAA does not record structural capacity, so no record can confirm it.
Overall
Infeasible without remediation
A high obstacle conflicts with the expanded footprint. Remediation or a different site.
The recorded pad is 60 ft short of the 100 ft footprint an eVTOL would need — shown to scale.
recorded pad eVTOL FATO
Recorded pad (limiting side)
40 ft
eVTOL FATO required
100 ft
FAA EB-105 vertiport pattern — 2× a ~50 ft eVTOL controlling dimension, plus a 125 ft safety-area side.
Load-bearing FATO
100 × 100 ft must be structural
No heliport precedent — typically the binding gate for rooftop and hospital pads.
Measured against FAA pad geometry and federal FATO sizing (EB-105). The obstruction screen is the only reading the engine verdict rests on; geometry and structural capacity are stated separately and never folded into it. A dimensional pre-screen — site-level validation required, and independent of the underwriting risk score.
FAA compliance
Q1 · FAA registrationPASS
Active FAA NASR 5010 record.
Q2 · Airspace determinationON_FILE
OE/AAA ASN 2024-AWP-4533-NRA: DET-to-Prop
Q3 · State enforcementMODERATE
State has partial enforcement framework.
Q4 · NFPA 418PARTIAL
IBC references NFPA 418 for rooftop facilities. Standalone fire code reference not confirmed.
Construction pressure: 1 crane case filed within 0.25 nm in the last 30 days (closest 197 ft AGL at 0.14 nm, FAA case 2026-AWP-16497-OE); 2 obstruction cases within 0.5 nm overall.
Situations are rules-based inferences across the obstruction, observed-operations and record layers, re-evaluated nightly; each carries its evidence and closes when the condition no longer holds.
CRANE · 80 ft AGL — PH37739A TPC Phoenix COW-Hayden
NRADET-to-PropASN 2024-AWP-4532-NRA2024-05-08
APRON - Construction · 20 ft AGL — APRON Construction
NRADET-to-PropASN 2024-AWP-4533-NRA2024-05-08
APRON - Construction · 20 ft AGL — APRON Construction
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2023-AWP-700-NRA2023-04-19
Heliport · 0 ft AGL — LAP ASN # 2023-WSA-30-LAP Construction of a new off-airport helipad.
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2021-AWP-1991-NRA2021-06-01
Heliport · 0 ft AGL — LAP ASN # 2021-WSA-52-LAP
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2011-AWP-1664-NRA2012-03-28
Heliport · 0 ft AGL — Establish a private use concrete surface heliport.
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2009-AWP-120-NRA2009-07-17
Heliport · 0 ft AGL — Establish an existing private use heliport. The heliport facility is located on airport property in Scottsdale Arizona. The point of contact during the study is John Meyer 480-483-1985.
NRAARCH-DeterminedASN 2008-AWP-207-NRA2008-07-11
Heliport · 0 ft AGL — FATO: 2000 ft taxi lane\r\nTLOF: 60' x 60'\r\nMagnetic direction of ingress/egress: 075/225\r\nSurface: concrete\r\nDillon Hanger Apron landing area
Blueprint
The record vs. what we measured
79/100
DATA INTEGRITY
eVTOL footprint
The 40 ft pad is 60 ft short of the 100 ft an eVTOL FATO requires (measured).
SIGNALFEDERAL RECORDMEASURED
Surface elevation1500 ftnot cross-checked
Structurenot on recordGround-level
Pad dimensions40 ft side (filed)40 ft side · measured
Coordinate integrityas filedterrain cross-checked
Independent inspectionowner self-reportednone on record
✓Federal record
→
✓Cross-checkedUSGS · Overture · dimensions
→
3Physically verifiedGround Truth capture
Obstructions, exact FATO geometry, surface condition, and downwash exposure require a physical Ground Truth capture — not shown above as measured. A field verification completes the record and writes the measured truth to this facility’s authority.
This page is the public data-integrity record. The full RiskIndex assessment — Q1–Q5 compliance, dimensional / FATO analysis, an underwriting-grade risk score, peer benchmark, and a sealed Site Intelligence Report — is available on request.